For photographers, videographers and creators
Timestamp photos and videos: a dated record of your original RAW files, clips and stills.
In the TimeBinder app, drag and drop your photos and videos. Your browser creates its digital fingerprint. Your file stays on your device—we never receive or see its contents.
TimeBinder adds a layer of protection against AI and human fraud and disputes. For photographers and video creators, it is a dated record that the original file existed by a date, if a copy or an AI-altered version is later disputed.
Your photos and videos never leave your computer. Each file is hashed locally on your own device. We never receive or see the original file contents.
How can you show when a photo or video existed?
Short answer: timestamp the original files soon after the shoot. TimeBinder records each file’s SHA-256 fingerprint on the Bitcoin blockchain, giving independent evidence that the file existed, in that exact form, no later than that time. If someone later posts your content and says it’s theirs, you can show when your original files existed.
Most modern cameras and smartphones can shoot RAW, and a timestamped RAW file keeps the original data from the shoot. A timestamp doesn’t prove who took a photo or that content isn’t AI-generated. It shows that these files existed no later than the recorded time.
How it works
No software to install. Your files stay on your device.
Drop your files
Add up to 10 files per TimeBind: RAW photos, source clips, the edited stills. Any file type and size works.
IMG_4821.DNG · shoot-clip-03.movHashed on your computer
Your browser works out a unique SHA-256 fingerprint for each file. The file stays on your device. The files never leave your device and TimeBinder never stores them.
fingerprint 9f2c…41ab · file stays with youSealed to Bitcoin
The fingerprints are anchored to the Bitcoin blockchain: ASAP (your own transaction, sent straight away) or Pooled (usually recorded within 24 to 48 hours, and often sooner, depending on Bitcoin network activity). You get a Proof of Time Certificate, a PDF with a QR code and the Bitcoin transaction ID.
✓ sealed · certificate ready
What creators timestamp
- RAW photos straight from the camera or phone
- Original video clips and source footage
- Edited stills and exports, before posting
- Video edit project files
- Paid or private content before release
- A single RAW photo taken during a video shoot
What if someone disputes when your content was made?
Imagine finding your images or footage posted by someone who insists they created it, and you have no independent record of when your files existed. Platforms may not step in on your side.
AI tools can copy your look, recreate poses or build scenes from your likeness, so a dated record of your original files matters more.
A TimeBind gives you an independent, checkable record of when each of your files existed, which helps you set out your timeline.
A timestamp shows that these exact files existed no later than the recorded time and still match their fingerprints. It does not show who made them, who owns them, or that anyone copied them.
Shooting RAW so the original data is kept
- On a phone, open camera settings and turn on RAW or ProRAW. On a camera, choose RAW or RAW+JPEG.
- Take photos as usual. RAW files hold far more original sensor data than a JPEG.
- If you are filming, pause and take one RAW photo of the scene.
- TimeBind a few RAW files or source clips from each session. You don’t need to timestamp every file.
- Timestamp the edited version too, so both versions have their own dates.
A layer of protection for photos and video
Photos and video are copied, edited and imitated with AI tools. A TimeBind records the fingerprint of the exact original, so you can show later that the file you hold existed by the recorded time and still matches. It does not show who took it or that the scene was real.
What a TimeBind shows, and what it doesn’t
What it shows
- That this exact file existed no later than the time recorded on the Bitcoin blockchain
- That a file shown later still matches its fingerprint: the same file gives the same fingerprint, and any edit gives a different one
- A record kept outside your own systems: an ASAP TimeBind can be checked on the Bitcoin blockchain without relying on TimeBinder, and a Pooled TimeBind is verified through TimeBinder
What it doesn’t show
- Who created, wrote or signed the file
- That the contents are true or accurate
- How a court or other decision-maker will treat it: that depends on the jurisdiction and the rules that apply. It isn’t legal advice
Photo and video guides, comparisons and tools
Photographers, videographers and agencies: what to date before you post or deliver, how to answer questions about when a photo was taken, and what to keep if someone copies your work.
- Before you post, send or submit
- Checking when a photo was taken, and whether it is real
- Copying, licensing and disputes
- Related pages and tools
Before you post, send or submit
- RAW photo existed before a date
- Timestamp a photo series before publishing
- Video edit project existed before a datePremiere, Final Cut and others
- Photoshop (PSD) file existed before a date
- Photo contest or stock submission evidence
- Does posting online prove you made it first?
Checking when a photo was taken, and whether it is real
- How to check when a photo was taken
- Date created vs date modified vs date taken
- Can a file’s date created be changed?
- How to prove a photo is not AI
- Deepfake or genuine? The push on AI evidence rules
- If the other side says your evidence is a deepfake
- Can screenshots be used as evidence?
- Content Credentials (C2PA) vs a timestamp
- Real or AI? Photo quiz
- Real or AI? interiors quiz
- Real or AI? food ads quiz
- Real or AI? travel quiz
- Real or AI? product-photos quiz
- Real or AI? art quizSix rounds of paintings. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Real or AI? weather quizSix rounds of landscape weather photographs. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Real or AI? architecture quizSix rounds of building exteriors. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Real or AI? cars quizSix rounds of parked-car photographs. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Real or AI? night-sky quizSix rounds of night-sky photographs. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Real or AI? plants quizSix rounds of plant and flower photographs. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Real or AI? skylines quizSix rounds of city-skyline photographs. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Is this person real? quizFive rounds of portraits, real adults against AI faces. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Real old photo or AI? quizFour rounds of black-and-white archive photographs against AI. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Real train photo or AI? quizSix rounds of railway photographs, real against AI. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Strange animals: real or AI? quizSix rounds of odd animals, real against invented AI creatures. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Real sign photo or AI? quizSix rounds of signs and lettering, real against AI. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Musical instruments: real or AI? quizThree rounds of instrument photographs, real against AI. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Mushrooms: real or AI? quizSix rounds of mushroom photographs, real against invented AI mushrooms. Never forage or eat anything based on a photo. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Underwater photos: real or AI? quizSix rounds of underwater photographs, real against AI. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Real cake or AI? quizFour rounds of cake photographs, real against AI. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Abandoned places: real or AI? quizSix rounds of abandoned-place photographs, real against AI. Photos only: do not enter derelict buildings. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Real crystal or AI? quizSix rounds of crystal and mineral photographs, real against AI. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Real or AI? wildlife quizSix rounds of wild-animal photographs. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Real or AI? pets quizSix rounds of cat and dog photographs. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Viral AI-fakes quiz
- Verified-capture photo apps vs a timestamp
Copying, licensing and disputes
- How to prove someone copied your work
- How timestamping could help settle a creator video disputeAn illustrative scenario
- How dated files could help an agency in an image disputeAn illustrative scenario
- Media article drafts and photo originalsAn illustrative scenario
- Whistleblower file authenticity and timeline
- Copyright registration vs a timestamp
Related pages and tools
- Timestamping for illustrators: a dated record of your work
- Timestamping for agencies
- IP and creative industry
- Free tool: Fingerprint Swatch
- Free SHA-256 hash checker
- Free photo metadata remover
- Photo contest entry checklistA checklist before you enter a photo or video contest. It does not identify generated media.
- AI watermark and label decoder
- Viral product-video red-flags checker
- Free Content Credentials (C2PA) checker
- Real or AI? Photo quiz
- Real or AI? interiors quiz
- Real or AI? food ads quiz
- Real or AI? travel quiz
- Real or AI? product-photos quiz
- Real or AI? art quizSix rounds of paintings. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Real or AI? weather quizSix rounds of landscape weather photographs. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Real or AI? architecture quizSix rounds of building exteriors. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Real or AI? cars quizSix rounds of parked-car photographs. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Real or AI? night-sky quizSix rounds of night-sky photographs. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Real or AI? wildlife quizSix rounds of wild-animal photographs. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Real or AI? pets quizSix rounds of cat and dog photographs. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Treehouses: real or AI? quizFour rounds of treehouse photographs, real against AI. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Earth and turf houses: real or AI? quizFive rounds of turf and earth house photographs, real against AI. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Miniatures and scale models: real or AI? quizFive rounds of miniature and diorama photographs, real against AI. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Swimming pools: real or AI? quizSix rounds of swimming pool photographs, real against AI. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Blown glass and glass ornaments: real or AI? quizSix rounds of blown glass and glass ornament photographs, real against AI. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Volcanoes and lava: real or AI? quizSix rounds of volcano and lava pictures, real against AI. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Giant vegetables: real or AI? quizFive rounds of giant pumpkin and vegetable pictures, real against AI. Spotting by eye is unreliable. It is not a tool for identifying generated media.
- Viral AI-fakes quiz
- Pricing: first TimeBind free
Learning path: AI fakes, real photos and proving your originals
Photographers and video makers are asked whether a picture is real, when it was taken and whether a copy is theirs. This four-stage path takes you from checking dates and authenticity, to keeping and dating originals, to Content Credentials and provenance, to protecting work you post. Each stage links to guides we have written. TimeBinder does not detect AI; a TimeBind is a dated record of your own files. It is general information, not legal advice.
Check when and whether it is real
What a file date can show and where it fails, and how to show a photo is not AI.
Keep and date your originals
RAW files, series and edit projects dated before you post, send or submit.
Content Credentials and provenance
What provenance labels can and cannot show, and how screenshots and deepfake claims are treated.
Protect work you post
AI training opt-outs and cloaking tools, copying, and what a dated original adds.
Before you publish a photograph, or if one is later questioned, the free published photo record checklist helps you review the camera original and the exact file you published. It cannot tell whether a photograph is generated.
Frequently asked questions
Can TimeBinder help with fake profiles or impersonators?
Impersonators often use stolen photos to build fake profiles, including on dating apps. If you timestamped one RAW photo from the same moment as your profile pictures, you can show when your original files existed. Independent, dated evidence can make an impersonation report more persuasive.
Can it help if my paid or private content is leaked or reposted?
You can show your original existed no later than the recorded time, with a certificate that can be checked later: an ASAP TimeBind directly against the blockchain, a Pooled TimeBind through TimeBinder. This can support a DMCA takedown request alongside your other evidence.
How can a RAW photo support a video?
A timestamped RAW photo taken during the shoot is an early, dated record of the scene. Combined with the video’s own timestamp, it shows both files existed by that date. A timestamp can’t show content isn’t AI-generated, but it shows when your original files existed.
Does it still help if my posted content is edited or compressed?
Yes. Timestamp both the original RAW file and the edited version you post. If authenticity is questioned, you can show both existed by their dates, with the RAW file dated first.
Does TimeBinder store my files?
No. Your files never leave your device. Your browser calculates a SHA-256 fingerprint of each file, and only that fingerprint is anchored to the Bitcoin blockchain.
Who can verify a TimeBind?
That’s up to you. Make a TimeBind publicly verifiable via a QR code, or restrict access to specific email addresses. Verification happens in the browser, and no one sees your original files.
Does a timestamp show when a photo was taken?
No. It shows that the file existed no later than the recorded time and has not changed since. A camera's date and location data can be edited, so keep the original file and, ideally, the RAW.
Does a timestamp prove a photo or video is not AI-generated?
No. A TimeBind does not detect AI and does not show how a file was made. It shows when your exact file existed. Keeping the RAW file, the sequence of shots and the edit project alongside it gives you a fuller story.
Is a timestamp the same as Content Credentials (C2PA)?
No. They record different things, and some creators may use both. A TimeBind records a dated fingerprint of an exact file. Our comparison page sets out the differences.
Should I timestamp the RAW, the edit or the export?
The original RAW or camera file before you edit it, and the files you publish or deliver. They are different files with different fingerprints, so each can have its own record.
Does a TimeBind show that a photo was not made with AI?
No. A TimeBind records that an exact file existed no later than a recorded time and still matches its fingerprint. A dated RAW original and your sequence of files are useful context, but TimeBinder does not detect AI and a TimeBind does not show who took a picture. Our guide explains what helps.
Related guides
- Creator timestampingThe creators hub: music, design, writing and art
- Prove a RAW photo existed before a dateA step-by-step guide
- Timestamp a photo series before publishingFor photographers
- Prove a video edit project existedFor editors and videographers
- Are color LUTs and presets copyrightable?Editing looks and copyright
- How timestamping could help resolve a creator disputeAn illustrative creator scenario
- Content Credentials (C2PA) vs a timestampTwo ways to show provenance
- When the other side says your evidence is a deepfakeWhat a timestamp can and can’t show
- How TimeBinder verifies when files existedChecking a file against the record
- Screenshot timestampingFor captures of posts, messages and listings
Open TimeBinder and timestamp your originals
Date your originals before you share them.
- Open the app and sign in with email or Google.
- Add your photos and videos. They stay on your computer.
- Seal them and download your Proof of Time certificates.
Your first Pooled TimeBind is free, with no credit card required. After that, Pooled TimeBinds start from US$5, and an ASAP TimeBind is US$15. See plans and pricing