Free tool: runs in your browser
AI agent file-access checklistbefore an assistant can change work files
TimeBinder adds a layer of protection against AI and human fraud and disputes. Review copies, permissions and the task, before you give an assistant write access to a contract, an exhibit, advice or notes.
Nothing you tick is sent anywhere. This page cannot stop a deletion, it is not a backup, and it is not legal advice.
Check the access you are about to give
Tick what is true of the session you are planning, or the one already running. You get a shareable result and clear next steps. Nothing you tick is sent to TimeBinder.
Your choices stay on this page. Nothing you tick is sent anywhere or tied to your name.
Tick everything that is true before you give an assistant write access
This looks at copies, permissions and the task you are about to set, not at the assistant's output. It cannot stop a file from being changed, and it is not legal advice.
What to do now
How should I let an AI assistant edit work files? The short answer
Give it a working copy, not the only copy. Confirm you can restore a recent version. Keep the prompt to a named file and a named change, and stay with the session if it can still write.
This checklist scores those points. It cannot stop a file from being changed. A TimeBind of a file you already hold can show that exact file existed no later than a recorded time and still matches. It is not a backup, and it is not legal advice.
Why this came up in November 2026
On 5 November 2026, University of Chicago law professor William Baude posted that, while he was at lunch, Claude deleted a year of constitutional-law lecture notes and his current syllabus. In a reply, he said the task had been to update page numbers in an older set of notes. He later wrote that he recovered the files through Dropbox, and shared the episode as a public service announcement. On 12 November 2026 the X API reported more than two million impressions on that post. Trade-press reports followed, including Tom's Hardware and NDTV.
This page does not use anyone's likeness, and it does not claim to know which product or setting was in use. The checks are written so they work the next time a lawyer, a writer or anyone else is about to let an assistant edit work product.
Sources: William Baude's 5 November post, his reply on what the task was, Tom's Hardware, and NDTV.
What this checklist does and does not do
The honest job of this page is to slow down a session that has write access to work product, not to protect the file for you.
| Part | What it does | What it does not do |
|---|---|---|
| A copy outside the assistant's reach | Gives you a reason to pause until that copy exists. | Create the copy, or restore a file that has already been changed. |
| Version history or file history | Reminds you to confirm you can restore a recent version. | Turn history on, or replace a backup policy at a firm. |
| Narrow permissions and a narrow prompt | Flags write access that is broader than a dedicated working copy. | Change the assistant's settings, or stop it mid-session. |
| A TimeBind of the file you already hold | Records that an exact file existed no later than a recorded time and still matches. | Store a recoverable copy, undo a deletion, or stand as legal advice. |
If the file is one you need to stand behind later
For a contract, an exhibit, an advice letter, lecture notes or any other work file you may have to show again:
- Keep a complete copy in a place the assistant cannot write to, and confirm you can restore a recent version.
- Make a TimeBind of the exact file you already hold, before the session if you can. The fingerprint is made in your browser and the file stays on your device.
- Store the file and the Proof of Time Certificate together, separately from the working copy.
A TimeBind shows the exact file existed no later than the recorded time and still matches. It does not show who wrote it, it is not a backup, and it is not legal advice.
First Pooled TimeBind free, no card, then from US$5. An ASAP TimeBind is US$15.
What a TimeBind shows, and what it does not. It shows that an exact file existed no later than a recorded time and that a copy shown later still matches its fingerprint. It does not show who made the file, who owns it, that its contents are true, or whether AI was used to make or edit it. This is general information, not legal advice.
If you are about to add an MCP server to an AI client, see also the free MCP server install checklist. It puts the checks in order, source, pinned version, token scope and reach, and cannot show whether a server is safe.
To log each agent session with what it could access and what you reviewed afterwards, see also the free AI coding agent session audit log. It cannot see your machine or make an agent safe.
AI agent file-access checklist: FAQ
Can this tool stop an AI assistant from deleting my files?
No. It cannot change the permissions on your computer, and it cannot undo a deletion. It only helps you review copies, access and the task you are about to set, before you give an assistant write access.
Is this legal advice?
No. It is general information for lawyers and anyone else who holds work files. Court and professional-conduct rules vary. Check the tool you are using, your own file-history settings, and your professional obligations.
If I make a TimeBind, is that a backup?
No. A TimeBind of an exact file records its SHA-256 fingerprint and a time. Later you can show that file existed no later than that time and still matches. It does not store a recoverable copy, and it will not restore a file that has been deleted.
What happened in the November 2026 case this page mentions?
On 5 November 2026, University of Chicago law professor William Baude posted that, while he was at lunch, Claude deleted a year of constitutional-law lecture notes and his current syllabus, after he had asked it to update page numbers in an older set of notes. He later said he recovered the files through Dropbox, and shared the story as a public service announcement. This page does not use his likeness, and it does not claim to know which product or setting was in use.
Is anything I tick sent to TimeBinder?
No. The checklist runs in your browser. Your ticks stay on the page.
Does a high result mean I have already lost files?
No. It means the access you described is broader than a careful working copy, or that you do not yet have a confirmed way to restore a file. Tighten that before you continue.
Related guides and tools
- Legal timestampingThe TimeBinder hub for lawyers, with the resale model
- How lawyers can prevent AI forgeriesA longer guide, including intake and records
- Preserving digital evidence: a client checklistA starting list to give a client
- How to prove a file existed before a dateWhat each method can and cannot show
- How to timestamp a contract versionDate a draft or a signed set before it moves
- Free SHA-256 hash checkerMake a fingerprint of a file in your browser
- File comparison checkerSee whether two files are identical
- All free toolsPrivate, in-browser tools
Date the file you already hold
Add a layer of protection against AI and human fraud and disputes: a dated, checkable record of the exact file, kept beside your own backup.
- Open the app and sign in with email or Google.
- Add your files. They stay on your computer.
- Seal them and download your Proof of Time certificates.
First Pooled TimeBind free, no card, then from US$5. See pricing.