Short answer: On 29 October 2026 the artist Chainsawroll posted that she was opening commission slots, with a US$4,500 full illustration, and added “Not ai, 100 percent human drawn art.” The post passed 11 million impressions, and many replies disputed both the price and whether the work was AI-made. On 31 October she wrote that she was seeing “smaller artists getting dogpiled too with accusations of ai.” The useful lesson is practical: if an accusation arrives, the best answer is a dated trail made while you worked. Keep layered files, work-in-progress exports and time-lapse recordings from the start. A TimeBind dates the exact files you hold. It does not prove that a human drew them or that no AI was used.
Last checked 13 November 2026. General information for illustrators and other visual artists, not legal advice. This page reports public posts. It does not judge any particular image, and nobody outside the process can settle by looking whether a picture is AI-made.
Table of Contents
What was posted
On 29 October 2026 Chainsawroll posted: “Slots are open. 4500 usd full illustration (1 slot), 800 usd portrait (3 slots)… Not ai, 100 percent human drawn art.” By 13 November that post had 11,042,270 impressions and 18,441 likes. Replies and quote posts disagreed about the price and about whether the example images looked AI-made. One quote post criticising the prices had 2,318 likes.
On 31 October she posted: “I am the biggest dogpile of the week on art twitter but I am starting to see smaller artists getting dogpiled too with accusations of ai. This is an epidemic and has to stop.” That post had 110,534 impressions and 6,262 likes. X’s automated story summary, which can make mistakes, says she shared a time-lapse and earlier work to show she drew the images, and that critics pointed to details such as eyes and hair strands. We have not examined the images and this page does not say whether the accusations were right.
What process records can and cannot show
A dated stack of work-in-progress files can show how a picture developed: sketch, flats, shading, final. A screen recording of a session can show the work being made. These are strong context, because they are hard to produce after the fact for a complex piece. But they are not proof of absolute negatives. Someone could in principle record a session while using other tools, and a viewer cannot see inside your process.
What records do give you is a specific, checkable answer instead of an argument about how an image “looks.” They also help with other disputes, such as copying, commission scope and platform declarations. Be honest about what they show when you present them.
Why people are searching for this
Measured on 13 November 2026. On X, the 29 October commission post had 11,042,270 impressions and 18,441 likes, and the 31 October follow-up had 110,534 impressions and 6,262 likes. Google autocomplete in the United States returned “how to prove my art is not ai” on 13 November. Counts keep moving.
Checklist for illustrators
- Work in layers and keep the files. Layered source files, saved at stages, show how a piece was built. Do not flatten and delete.
- Record your sessions. A time-lapse or screen recording, saved as a file and dated, is one of the clearest records for a finished piece.
- Keep sketches and references. Dated sketches, thumbnails and the references you used belong in the same folder.
- Date milestones as you go. Fingerprint the sketch, the flats and the final file when you finish each stage, not only at the end. The draft streak tool helps keep a rhythm.
- Be clear about your own AI use. If you use any AI tool in a piece, say so and log it. If you use none, say that plainly in your listing or commission terms.
- Save the accusation as it stands. If someone accuses you, screenshot the post with its date and link, and respond with the specific records, calmly. See what artists can keep when a commission is called AI.
- Put it in the commission terms. Say in writing whether AI tools are used, and what process records you will share with clients. The illustration commission brief checklist can help.
What a TimeBind does and does not show
A TimeBind is a dated, checkable record that an exact file existed no later than a recorded time and still matches. The SHA-256 fingerprint is made in your browser and the file is never uploaded. The record is anchored to Bitcoin (a Merkle root in an OP_RETURN). Your first Pooled TimeBind is free; after that, TimeBinds start from US$5, and an ASAP TimeBind is US$15. See how it works.
For an illustration, it can date a layered file, a sketch, a time-lapse recording or a final export as you hold them. It does not show that a human drew a picture, does not show that no AI tool was used, and does not show who owns the copyright. It shows that those exact files existed no later than the recorded time. Combine it with the process files themselves.
Limits
This page relies on Chainsawroll’s posts on X (29 and 31 October 2026), a quote post by @SparxRockStellz, X’s automated story summary (which can be wrong), and Google autocomplete, all checked 13 November 2026. We have not seen the artwork or any time-lapse and make no statement about whether any image was AI-generated. This is not legal advice.
Tools that can help
Use the bulk SHA-256 manifest to fingerprint a project folder with its layers and recordings, and the process promise tool to write down how you work. See also what artists should keep after ArtStation’s AI declarations.
Frequently Asked Questions
-
Did the artist prove her work was not AI?
We cannot say. She stated it was human-drawn, and X’s story summary says she shared a time-lapse. We have not examined the images or her records, and nobody outside the process can settle it by looking.
-
Can a time-lapse prove I drew something?
It is strong supporting evidence for a complex piece, but it is not proof of an absolute negative. Keep layered files, sketches and dated exports as well.
-
Can a TimeBind prove my art is human-made?
No. A TimeBind shows exact files existed no later than a recorded time and still match. It does not show how they were made.
-
When should I date my work-in-progress?
At each stage you finish, such as sketch, flats and final, so the dates show the order in which the piece developed.
-
What should I do if someone accuses me of using AI?
Save the accusation with its date and link, respond calmly with specific records, and avoid claims your records cannot support.
Sources checked
- Chainsawroll (@chainsawroll), posts on X, 29 and 31 October 2026, https://x.com/chainsawroll/status/2115926837323079921 and https://x.com/chainsawroll/status/2116605423348568183 (read 13 November 2026)
- @SparxRockStellz, quote post on X, 31 October 2026, https://x.com/SparxRockStellz/status/2116657262832029924 (read 13 November 2026)
- X automated story summary “Artist Faces Backlash Over $4,500 Digital Illustration Price,” 1 November 2026 (Grok-generated, can contain errors; checked 13 November 2026)
- X impression and like counts and Google autocomplete (US), checked 13 November 2026
Date each stage of your work as you finish it
Your first Pooled TimeBind is free, with no credit card required. After that, TimeBinds start from US$5, and an ASAP TimeBind is US$15. Click here to start, or see plans and pricing.
